The presentations below are available as they are and remain the property of their original authors.
Publication, dissemination, modification, sharing without sourcing or commercial use of any of the presentations available below, even partial or modified, is strictly forbidden without the authorisation of their Original Authors. Unless stated otherwise, the opinions and statements in the presentations below are personal, and are not the ones of EUFEMED or the Authors’ Related Organisations. Any of the material below can be removed at any time by EUFEMED, on request of their Original Owner or without justification. EUFEMED does not guarantee full time availability of those documents, and can amend or remove this webpage at their own discretion.
Pre-Conference Workshop Wednesday, May 24, 2023
Conducting human challenge trials: COVID-19 and beyond… Chairs: Henri Caplain, France; Jan de Hoon, Belgium |
|
General introduction: Challenge studies, what’s in a name? Jan de Hoon, Belgium |
Download |
Challenge studies with infectious agents Emma Smith, United Kingdom |
Download |
Challenge studies with infectious agents: pro, cons and ethical aspects Hugh Davies, United Kingdom |
Download |
Challenge studies in asthma Harun Badakhshi, Germany |
TBA/TBC |
Break | |
Challenge studies with immunological stimulants Matthijs Moerland, The Netherlands |
Download |
Challenge agents in target engagement models Jan de Hoon, Belgium |
Download |
General discussion and closing remarks |
Day 1 – Thursday, 25 May, 2023
Welcome and Introduction by the President Tim Hardman, UK |
|
How to assess risk from pre-clinical to clinical research more efficiently | Experiences and suggestions Chairs: Jan de Hoon, Belgium; Rob Zuiker, The Netherlands |
|
The pre-clinical perspective Stephanie Plassmann, Germany |
Download |
The clinical perspective Henri Caplain, France |
Download |
Moderated plenary discussion with the speakers | |
Break | |
Challenges in healthy volunteers and patient recruitment for human pharmacology trials – Experiences and Suggestions Chairs: Izaak den Daas, The Netherlands; Yves Donazzolo, France |
|
Studies in healthy volunteers: Evolution in recruitment of healthy volunteer trials, before, during and after the pandemic Jelle Klein, Belgium |
Download |
Main challenges for the inclusion of patients in phase I trials Izaak den Daas, The Netherlands |
TBA/TBC |
„Why I took part in a clinical trial“ – Results from a motivation survey amongst Polish healthy volunteers Agnieszka Kulesza, Poland |
Download |
Ethical challenges in recruitment for phase I trials Yves Donazzolo, France |
Download |
Moderated plenary discussion with the speakers: How to improve the situation? |
|
Lunch Break | |
Early clinical proof of effect of inhaled lung therapies in Phase 1 : Evaluation of mode of action and drug deposition in the target organ of healthy subjects Johannes H. Nagelschmitz |
TBA/TBC |
Can TRPA1-Antagonists Solve The Unmet Medical Need For Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy? Heleen Marynissen |
TBA/TBC |
Optimising paediatric medicines development through early selection of the best accepted formulation with a scientifically sound composite endpoint method Viviane Klingmann, Germany |
TBA/TBC |
Piloting new patient centric sampling approaches in phase-1 clinical trials Jorien Gilops |
TBA/TBC |
Healthy Volunteers in Distress: Creating A Guideline For Implementation Of Emergency Mock Trainings In A Phase I Clinical Pharmacology Unit Thomas De Ridder |
TBA/TBC |
Feasibility Assessment Of The BD Rhapsody™ Single-cell RNA-sequencing Platform On Liver Fine-needle Aspirates And Blood Of Healthy Volunteers Jonathan Janssens |
TBA/TBC |
Break | |
Increasing Digitalisation in Human Pharmacology Studies Management: Helping or Hindering Speeding-up clinical trials? – Experiences and Suggestions Chairs: Sybille Baumann, Germany; Henri Caplain, France |
|
Nextgen endpoints for clinical drug development Kristin Hannesdottir, United States; Jelena Curcic, Switzerland Digitalisation in early clinical trials: theory and practical examples |
|
Moderated plenary discussion |
Day 2 – Friday, 26 May, 2023
How to assess risk from pre-clinical to clinical research more efficiently – Experiences and suggestions Chairs: Paul Goldsmith, UK; Joachim Höchel, Germany |
|
POM – It is all about proof of mechanism Fabienne Schumacher, Germany |
TBA/TBC |
From Celecoxib to Gene Editing – Experiences of a London based first in human principal investigator Jörg Täubel, UK |
TBA/TBC |
Fair consent processes in early phase research – striking a balance between benefits and harms Hugh Davies, UK |
Download |
Break | |
None fits all: (adaptive) scientific advice formats in the (innovative) pharmaceutical development process – Experiences and Suggestions Chairs: Ingrid Klingmann, Belgium; Dick de Vries, The Netherlands; Joachim Hoechel, Germany |
|
Presentation of the new regulatory support toolbox for early (clinical) development and beyond Bettina Ziegele, Germany |
Download |
Moderated plenary discussion: How can these options best be used for innovative early pharmaceutical medicines development by academia, large and small pharma companies? | TBA/TBC |
Lunch Break | |
Ensure Efficiency of Collaboration between Sponsors and Clinical Trial Units under the Clinical Trial Regulation – Experiences and Suggestions Chairs: Hardman, UK; Jelle Klein, Belgium |
|
How can CROs support big pharma as well as small biotech companies in their CTR submission Sybille Baumann, Germany |
TBA/TBC |
Sponsor and CTU communication during the dossier preparation and trial authorisation process – Experiences from sponsor and site perspectives Emma Meijer, The Netherlands |
TBA/TBC |